Mesothelioma of the Pleura - Photodynamic Therapy
Photodynamic therapy of malignant mesothelioma of pleura
4. DISCUSSION
Single modality therapeutic management has yielded few long-term survivors in malignant pleural mesothelioma. The role of surgery is generally considered to be limited. Pleurectomy/decortication is an incomplete tumour-debulking procedure and therefore ineffective as a single treatment with curative aim.
Extensive surgery by EPP has been advocated as a theoretically more attractive operation because it may allow a radical excision, but only a minority of patients with mesothelioma qualify for this operation and it carries a higher risk. Studies have shown that patients undergoing EPP have a greater tendency towards development of distant diseasel6. The therapeutic challenge is two-fold, effective treatment regimens for malignant mesothelioma must address the problem of systemic disease as well in order to obtain local and systemic control of the malignancy. Combined treatment modality appears to offer some promise in this otherwise rapidly fatal diseasel7.
The impact of the presented method in a small and heterogeneous patient group is difficult to evaluate. However, patients no. 2 and 6 reoperated a year after initial treatment were completely free from tumour within the thoracic cavity. During the follow-up, in 3 patienes distant metastases.were seen prior to recurrency within the treated hemithorax. Such results of relatively long-lasting local control were obtained in patients undergoing various surgical procedures with low mortality/morbidity. The tumours of these patienes presented photosensitizer Suorescence of even distribution and of high intensity. Patients with tumours of inhomogenious (related to the differentiation grade) and low fluorescence intensities showed rapid recurrency and metastases.
Patient no. 6, presenting a relatively high nuorescence intensity of the initial tumour and a significantly lower intensity in the metastatic tumour, showed generalized malignancy only 3 months after retreatment.
An approach by thoracoscopic PDT13 was considered not useful in these patients all of whom presented tumour masses of large size located in the costophrenic sulcus. CT scans did not offer sufficent accuracy to evaluate tumour thickness, especially in the costophrenic sulcus. We experienced improved surgical radicality as well as improved access for light exposure in this area by doing complete diaphragmatic resection.
As a conclusion we present the hypothesis that associated PDT-treatment has a clinical effect and that predictability of PDT-efficiency seem to be related to the distribution and intensity of the fluorescence induced by the photosensitiser in tumour (Table 1). The PDT-effect may enhance the potential to complete local tumour eradication even in the case of less aggressive surgical debulking procedure. However, as clearly visualized in this study a multimodal therapeutic approach addressing to the systemic disease seems necessary to further improve survival.
5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This study was finacially supported by The Norwegian Cancer Society. Photosensitiser and some of the technical equipment was a gift from Lederle, American Cyanamid.
6. REFERENCES
1. J.C. Wagner, E.A. Sleggs and P. Marchand, "Diffuse pleural
mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the North Western Cape Province,"
Br. J. Int. Med., 17, pp. 260-271, 1960.
2. K.H. Antman, P.F. Li, R. Osteen et al., "Mesothelioma,"
Cancer Updates, 3, pp. 1-16, 1989.
3. A.S. Alberts, G. Falkson, L. Goedhals, D.A. Vorobiof and C.A.
Van Der Merwe, "Malignant pleural mesotheoioma: a disease unaffected
by current therapeutic maneuvers," J. Clin. Oncol., 6, pp.
527-534, 1988.
4. L.W. Brady, "Mesothelioma - the role for radiation therapy,"
Semin. Oncol., 8, pp. 329-334, 1981.
5. S.L. Marcus, "Clinical photodynamic therapy: The continuing
evolutibn," Photodynamic therapy; basic principles and clinical
apSicatimnS, B.W. Henderson and TJ. Dougherty (eds.), pp. 219-2684
Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1992.
6. TJ. Dougherty and S.L. Marcus, "Photodynamic therapy,"
Eur. J. Cancer, 28A, pp. 1734-1742, 1992.
7. TJ. Dougherty, "Photodynamic therapy," Photochem. Photobiol.,
58, pp. 895-900, 1993.
8. J. Moan and K. Berg, "Photochemotherapy of cancer: Experimental
research," Photochem. Photobiol., 5S, pp. 931-948, 1992.
9. B.W. Henderson and T.J. Dougherty, "How does photodynamic
therapy work?" Photochem. Photobiol., 55, pp. 145-157, 1992.
10. K.R. Weishaupt, C.J. Gomer and T.J. Dougherty, "Identification
of singlet oxygen as the cytotoxic agent in the photoactivation
of a murine tumour," Cancer res., 36, pp. 2326-2329, 1976.
11. S.L. Gibson, T.H. Foster, R.H. Feins, R.F. Raubertas, M.A. Fallon
and R. Hill, "Effects of Photodynamic therapy on xenografts
of human mesothelioma and rat mammary carcinoma," Br. J. Cancer,
69, pp. 473-481, 1994.
12. R.H. Feins, R. Hilf, H. Ross and S.L. Gibson, "Photodynamic
therapy for human malignant mesothelioma in the nude mouse,"
J. Surg. Res., 49, pp. 311-314, 1990.
13. L. Lofgren, M. Larsson, L. Thaning and S. Hallgren, "Transthoracic
endoscopic photodynamic treatment of malignant mesothelioma,"
(letter), The Lancet, 337, p. 359, 1991.
14. H.-B. Riis, HJ. Altermatt, R. Inderbitzi, R. Hess, B. Nachbur,
J.C.M. Stewart, Q. Wang, K.C. Lim, R. Bonnett, M.C. Berenbaum and
U. Althaus, "Photodynamic therapy with chlorins for diffuse
malignant mesothelioma: initial clinical results," Br. J. Cancer,
64, pp. 1116-1120, 1991.
15. H. Heyerdahl, T. Warloe, Q. Peng, K. Svanberg, J. Moan, H.B.
Steen, L.O. Svaasand and K.-E. Ciercksky, t¤Dosimetry and light
distribution systems for photodynamic lherapy at the Norwegian Radium
Hospital," Photodynamic Theragxy of Cancer. G. Jori, J. Moan
and W. Star (eds.), pp.27-36, SPIE Vol. 2078, 1993.
16.V.W. Rush, S. Piantadosi and E.C. Holmes, "The role of extrapleural
pneumonectomy in malignant pleural mesothelioma," J. Thorac.
Cardiovasc. Surg., 102, pp. 1-9, 1991.
17. L.B. Weissmann and K.H. Antman, "Incidence, presentation
and promising new treatments for malignant mesothelioma." Oncology
Williston Park, 3, pp. 67-72, 1989.
